Dear Editor,
Science has gone woke.
Recently a whisleblower scientist named Dr. Patrick Brown blew a whistle on the editors of the leading climate science journals. The editors of these scientific journals wield enormous power over the scientific field. These journals are what public policy is based on. They are the most authoritative source of scientific knowledge. They control scientific research. They determine what is published and what is not. There is a saying among scientists "Either publish or perish." The scientists' careers depend on being published. Scientists must, one way or another, get their scientific papers published - even if they have to cheat. The scientists are at the mercy of the editors. Those editors' belief is that climate change is real and about to destroy us. They publish only those papers that agree with that narrative. So, the scientists conducting their research, must ommit opposing facts so that their paper confirms climate change. Remember the phrase "There is scientific consensus on climate change."? This consensus is a manufactured one - not a real one! These scientists are forced to cheat so that they can get published in order to advance their careers! Oh, and by the way, the press is complicit in this affair. The main street media makes sure that they promote climate change alarmism.
6 MONTHS FOR 99¢! | Get Our Best Offer of the Year.
Dr. Patrick Brown proved that the editors of leading scientific journals were hurting climate science. Those editors had rejected earlier papers that did not go along with their climate change narrative. So, when he conducted more research and wrote another paper, he left out important data so that it would affirm the climate change narrative. When he submitted it, the editor of Nature accepted it - #https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/top-scientist-patrick-brown-says-he-deliberately-omitted-key-fact-in-climate-change-piece-he-s-just-had-published-in-prestigious-journal-to-ensure-woke-editors-ran-it-that-80-of-wildfires-are-started-by-humans/ar-AA1ghfMR?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=42cde0064bb94fe5a4032d83762b88cf&ei=19.
Another scientist, Dr Judith Curry, was a rock star climate change supporter until some colleagues pointed out gaps in her research. She investigated those gaps which led her to realize that, although climate change is real, it is not a crisis. Fossil fuels aren't so terrible. She was immediately ostracized! It seems to me that her position is the most likely one to be correct - #
.
In the 1980s, and 90s, there was the spotted owl controversy. They wanted to stop logging in order to protect the spotted owl. Refer to the link below. The results of that was the creation of another endangered species - loggers -
https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=20000806&slug=4035697#https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=20000806&slug=4035697.
What's going on here? Americans have never acted like this before, and on such a lagre scale! Why do they oppose controlled burns? Aren't they thinking rationally? Several possible reasons. I don't know which one it is. The woke people mis-diagnose the problem, won't listen to others, and force their disasterous solutions on society.
Greg Taylor