Peer-reviewed study: CO2 emissions have zero impact on global temperatures, with Judith Curry
The study, Science Direct, concludes that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for planet an increase in CO2, there is serious doubt that this is, in fact, the case.
Peer-reviewed study: CO2 emissions have zero impact on global temperatures
by WorldTribune Staff, July 26, 2024 Contract With Our Readers
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have no impact on the Earth’s global temperatures, according to a peer-reviewed scientific study.
The study, published in Science Direct, concludes that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for the planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious doubt that this
is, in fact, the case.
The study’s authors concluded that “their research unequivocally means that the officially presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated reality,” Tracy Beanz and Michelle Edwards wrote in a July 25 analysis for The Highwire.
The study, conducted by researchers from the Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology in Warsaw, Poland, found that even if all the world’s coal was dug up, all the world’s oil was extracted, and they were all burned in one giant pyre, the CO2 emissions from that endeavor would not heat up planet Earth.
“Indeed, this is because carbon dioxide does not cause the Earth to warm up indefinitely,” the analysis noted of the study.
The researchers also confirmed what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are doing.”
The warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reached its limit decades ago, the study concludes.
As reported by Slay News, much like a sponge, the Earth’s atmosphere can only hold so much, meaning that carbon dioxide can no longer increase temperatures since the saturation point was reached a long time ago.
The study uses a hypothetical concept of a fire inside a greenhouse consistently emitting heat. The glass walls and ceiling can contain only so much heat before emitting it outside. CO2 in the atmosphere is very similar in that it can act as a “greenhouse” gas, but all the CO2 together can only contain so much heat, much like the hypothetical greenhouse.
The CO2 Coalition agrees with this conclusion as well. Thus, amidst all the fearmongering around climate change—and the knowledge that many things, including changes in solar activity heavily influence Earth’s weather — Curry believes even if the Earth is warming, it is not a dangerous thing:
“This whole issue of ‘dangerous’ is the weakest part of the whole argument,” Curry, Professor Emeritus and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, said. “What is dangerous? Everybody has a different idea of what’s good. The only harm from warming is rising sea levels. And that’s a slow creep unless something catastrophic happens, say, to the West Antarctic ice sheet. And if something catastrophic happens there, that’s as likely to be associated with under-ice volcanoes as it is to be with global warming.”
Looks like my previous comment got cancelled.
Here, have another copy.
ABSTRACT:
Earth is cooler w atmosphere/WV/30% albedo not warmer.
Ubiquitous RGHE heat balance graphics don't + violate LoT.
Kinetic heat transfer processes of contiguous atmospheric molecules render surface BB impossible.
RGHE is bogus & CAGW is a scam!
FACTS & EVIDENCE:
FACT 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GHGs and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K).
That’s NOT what the RGHE theory says.
EVIDENCE:
RGHE theory “288 K w – 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. 288 K is a surface measurement. 255 K is an equilibrium calculation at ToA.
Apples and potatoes.
Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies”
Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”
UCLA Diviner lunar mission data
JWST solar shield
ISS HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)
Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)
FACT 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a Black Body.
EVIDENCE:
According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a Black Body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors.
FACT 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a near Black Body.
EVIDENCE:
As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
For the experimental write up see:
https://principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
CONCLUSION:
No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
BSME CU ‘78
The legacy of the tobacco industry is huge, isn’t it
There are still NO peer reviewed articles proving beyond doubt that the Pope is Catholic