Want to See Something Real Scary?
The UN and the WHO have some really scary plans for all of us when it comes to the climate and food, after having just come off the COVID debacle and coverup they engineered in service to China.
Want to See Something Real Scary?
DEC 28, 2023
The United Nations and the World Health Organization have some really scary plans for all of us when it comes to the climate and food, after having just come off the COVID debacle and coverup they engineered in service to China. Following the COP28 failure to achieve anything whatsoever, the UN and WHO have simply declared victory and moved ahead to implement their strategies to put us all under their firm thumbs.
World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesusrecently did a video that tells us he and the UN used COP28 to secure one of those undecipherable and mealy-mouthed agreements designed to obscure rather than disclose plans:
Energy Security and Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscribe
These remarks from the man who worked closely with Anthony Fauci, got everything wrong on COVID and is a shill for China, indicate the sort of plans globalist elites have in mind, but few of details. We know they are deliberately linking climate and food systems and seek a transition away from fossil fuels and meat to supposedly green energy and plant-based food systems but little more. Yet, common sense tells us a plant-based food system would benefit tremendously by more CO2, and there is no climate crisis per se, so we know this all about something else and that something else is control over the global population.
A glimpse of the plans is found here but it’s all gibberish, of course. The infinitely flexible term “sustainable” abounds and the following is typical of the vacuous pronouncements:
Results of such initiatives demonstrate our food systems are a key determinant of malnutrition and contribute one third of global greenhouse gas emissions, as well as the great need- and potential- of food systems transformation and dietary shifts to both adapt to, and mitigate, the impacts of climate change and enhance the health of people and planet.
They want transformation and dietary shifts to adapt and mitigate climate change they say but no hungry man gives a damn about climate nor do those who won’t shut up about it being in crisis and refuse to live as if it were one. That leaves the vast middle among us who understand meat is critical to a healthy human diet and know that bacon improves the test of almost anything.
Then, there is this referenced document from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), which begins as follows:
For the global community to achieve the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, we must all embrace innovative solutions to intractable challenges To date, the challenges of climate change and malnutrition – two major barriers to sustainable development – have been considered almost exclusively in isolation of one another However, climate change and malnutrition are interlinked, and solutions can be mutually reinforcing.
When they refer to the “global community” they mean global elites, of course, and by “sustainable development” they mean development they control and by which their club benefits. Accordingly, it means whatever they want it to mean at a given moment. Indeed, “sustainable” may be the most malleable word in the English dictionary.
The scary part is captured in this table (red outlining added):
So, what exactly does “diversify” mean when it comes to animal production? Eat the bugs? Surely, it does not mean adding more rabbits to the menu. No politically correct UN author would dare recommend killing and eating such cute little furry things. No, it would have to be something ugly and unappealing as an animal per se. It could only mean bugs or worms. After all, no one cares about them.
And, while we are defining terms, what are integrated actions anyway? Well, my guess it’s just more obfuscatory language intended to signal the UN intends every available leverage at its disposal to make us eat the bugs and, more importantly for the elitist grifters, accept unnecessary and ineffective climate solutions that further empower and enrich the elites behind this nonsense. They got 130 countries to sign on because they intend to force Western governments into bribing Third World leaders who will take the bribes and run.
Notice, too, the language above about “dietary guidelines” and shifting of diets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Can we assume the same corporatist outfits who were behind anti-fat diets and desiring of more carb consumption via grains and sugar are behind this, too? I suspect so. It looks like a repeat run for the gold, using government institutions to force behaviors that benefit those corporatists and we all know who they are. And, here is they recommendation for their benefit (Emphasis added):
Implementing market incentives, consumer awareness and behaviour change actions, including front of package nutrition labelling, social marketing and retail promotion schemes, tax incentives, communications campaigns and nutrition counselling, to encourage the purchase and consumption of nutritious foods from sustainable agricultural practices.
There you go. Just like the green energy grifting schemes also promoted in this same document, sustainable food production means incentives (subsidies) and marketing help for certain special interests. Likewise, the whole idea is here make the general population dependent on the elites. It’s part of the biggest lie ever told; that one can own nothing and be happy as others control their lives, steal the fruits of their labor and force them to rent everything from the owners of the company store. It’s as scary as it gets.
#Food #Energy #WHO #UN #Sustainability #Agenda2030
There has been an explosion of human population and flourishing because of three factors, access to energy, fertilizers, & medication all which have their orgins in fossil fuels. And as the institutionalize of peak "resources" permeates thru the global regulating the linchpin is desgin to accplomish two things: 1) protect current resources by keeping it in the ground & 2) to get around check and balances like they did with covid.
None of it will work, as science has a way of destroying ideologically.