This is the point where proof is given to refute the disastrous man-made climate change, yet the story will get spun like this proof does not disprove the idea that C02 is the main drive because the sea ice is not at it's maximum, it's shrinking! And to be fair that it true a stable environment-in this case Artic Sea Ice-does not disprove that CO2 increase the warming cycle of the planet. But what a stable environment does prove is the interaction between increase emission and the effects are not well understood. And to forecast the future based on this is a fools errand and the remedies being implemented cause more damage or harm then good which will cause us to misallocate capital and resources to adapt to an possible event.
We have trouble getting a 3-day weather forecast right. The sheer arrogance of the climate predictors is unabated.
This is the point where proof is given to refute the disastrous man-made climate change, yet the story will get spun like this proof does not disprove the idea that C02 is the main drive because the sea ice is not at it's maximum, it's shrinking! And to be fair that it true a stable environment-in this case Artic Sea Ice-does not disprove that CO2 increase the warming cycle of the planet. But what a stable environment does prove is the interaction between increase emission and the effects are not well understood. And to forecast the future based on this is a fools errand and the remedies being implemented cause more damage or harm then good which will cause us to misallocate capital and resources to adapt to an possible event.