The idealization of peer review as the arbiter of good science is problematic for many reasons, but one is that it downplays the possibility that bad science can appear in the peer reviewed literature
As a retired scientist I have been greatly dismayed by the gross and blatant politicalization of science and publications over the last 10 years or so. Plagiarism has greatly accelerated as well. This will curl your ears further perhaps:
Redux - China’s Fake Science Industry: Fraud is a Lifestyle
As a retired scientist I have been greatly dismayed by the gross and blatant politicalization of science and publications over the last 10 years or so. Plagiarism has greatly accelerated as well. This will curl your ears further perhaps:
Redux - China’s Fake Science Industry: Fraud is a Lifestyle
https://open.substack.com/pub/tucoschild/p/redux-chinas-fake-science-industry?r=2mh23j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
PRC supports anything to debase the West and get ahead